Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Predicting expected progeny difference for marbling score in Angus cattle using artificial neural networks and Bayesian regression models.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 11 Sept 2013

Okut Hayrettin, Wu Xiao-Liao, Rosa Guilherme J M, Bauck Stewart, Woodward Brent W, Schnabel Robert D, Taylor Jeremy F, Gianola Daniel

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Artificial neural networks (ANN) mimic the function of the human brain and are capable of performing massively parallel computations for data processing and knowledge representation. ANN can capture nonlinear relationships between predictors and responses and can adaptively learn complex functional forms, in particular, for situations where conventional regression models are ineffective. In a previous...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Bayes Theorem

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Breeding

Share to Cattle

Share to Genome

Share to Linear Models

Share to Neural Networks, Computer

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 24024641
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-34
PMCID: PMC3851253

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Predicting expected progeny difference for marbling score in Angus cattle using artificial neural networks and Bayesian regression models.PMID 24024641Read ↗

Improving genomic prediction accuracy for meat tenderness in Nellore cattle using artificial neural networks.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of neural networks with back-propagation to genome-enabled prediction of complex traits in Holstein-Friesian and German Fleckvieh cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Benchmarking machine learning and parametric methods for genomic prediction of feed efficiency-related traits in Nellore cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Interpretable artificial neural networks incorporating Bayesian alphabet models for genome-wide prediction and association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-enabled prediction of reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using parametric models and machine learning methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of methods for predicting genomic breeding values for growth traits in Nellore cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP pre-selection with the Elastic-Net algorithm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.