Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Detecting selection along environmental gradients: analysis of eight methods and their effectiveness for outbreeding and selfing populations.

Molecular ecology - 1 Mar 2013

De Mita Stéphane, Thuillet Anne-Céline, Gay Laurène, Ahmadi Nourollah, Manel Stéphanie, Ronfort Joëlle, Vigouroux Yves

Abstract excerpt

Thanks to genome-scale diversity data, present-day studies can provide a detailed view of how natural and cultivated species adapt to their environment and particularly to environmental gradients. However, due to their sensitivity, up-to-date studies might be more sensitive to undocumented demographic effects such as the pattern of migration and the reproduction regime. In this study, we provide guidelines for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adaptation, Physiological
Share to Databases, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Environment

Share to Gene-Environment Interaction

Share to Genetic Drift

Share to Genetic Loci

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23294205
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12182

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Detecting selection along environmental gradients: analysis of eight methods and their effectiveness for outbreeding and selfing populations.PMID 23294205Read ↗

The power of allele frequency comparisons to detect the footprint of selection in natural and experimental situations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The search for loci under selection: trends, biases and progress.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genetic consequences of selection in natural populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by F(ST) do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting spatial genetic signatures of local adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing methods for detecting multilocus adaptation with multivariate genotype-environment associations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting adaptive evolution based on association with ecological gradients: orientation matters!Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of mutation rate on estimators of genetic differentiation--lessons from Arabidopsis thaliana.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.