Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics - 1 Apr 2012

Fisher Rebecca

Abstract excerpt

The author offers personal reflections on the implications of the article "Managing Incidental Findings & Research Results in Genomic Research Involving Biobanks & Archived Datasets" in terms of how the article addresses serious knowledge disparities and differing expectations between participants and researchers.Genet Med 2012:14(4):458-460.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Research
Share to BRCA1 Protein
Share to Breast Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genetics, Medical

Share to Genomics

Share to Incidental Findings

Share to Truth Disclosure

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22361901
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.6

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?PMID 22361901Read ↗

Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental findings: the time is not yet ripe for a policy for biobanksSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Systematic Review of the Management of Incidental Finding in Genomics ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical Considerations in Research with Genomic DataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing results to genomic research participants: differences that matter.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

No expectation to share incidental findings in genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Response to open peer commentaries on "Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives".Semantic proximity Read ↗

At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Biobanks: Importance, Implications and Opportunities for Genetic CounselorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.