Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth - 18 Jan 2011

Szczepura Ala, Osipenko Leeza, Freeman Karoline

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Postnatal and antenatal anti-D prophylaxis have dramatically reduced maternal sensitisations and cases of rhesus disease in babies born to women with RhD negative blood group. Recent scientific advances mean that non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), based on the presence of cell-fr...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cost-Benefit Analysis
Share to England
Share to Isoantibodies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mass Screening

Share to Rh-Hr Blood-Group System

Share to Rh Isoimmunization

Share to Rho(D) Immune Globulin

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 21244652
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-5
PMCID: PMC3034710

Genes

NHS
RHD

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-21244652-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales.PMID 21244652Read ↗

High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Noninvasive Fetal RhD Typing for Targeted ProphylaxisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Implementation of high-throughput non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal RHD genotype testing in England: Results of a cross-sectional survey of maternity units and expert interviews.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive foetal RhD genotyping: A strategy for rationalizing anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis in RhD-negative pregnant women at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal Rhesus D: ready for Prime(r) Time.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fetal RHD genotyping is a cost-effective option for supporting targeted anti-D prophylaxis in D-negative pregnancies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic accuracy of routine antenatal determination of fetal RHD status across gestation: population based cohort study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Routine noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal Rh D in maternal plasma-A 2-year experience from a single center in Belgium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.