Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A cycle-based model to predict blastocyst transfer cancellation

19 Dec 2009

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Extended culture for blastocyst transfer is thought to result in embryos with high implantation potential, enabling the transfer of fewer embryos and the reduction of multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, one major drawback of extended culture is the risk of transfer cancellation if no blastocyst develops by Day 5, despite the observation of adequate early embryo...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20023290
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep439

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A cycle-based model to predict blastocyst transfer cancellationPMID 20023290Read ↗

Does Conventional Morphological Evaluation Still Play a Role in Predicting Blastocyst Formation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Does conventional morphological evaluation still play a role in predicting blastocyst formation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Outcomes for Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer of Day 5 and Day 6 With Different Quality: a Large Matched-cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing Day 5 versus Day 6 euploid blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer and developing a predictive model for optimizing outcomes: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

D6 blastocyst transfer on day 6 in frozen-thawed cycles should be avoided: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation programSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients–do we need more information?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The association between pregnancy outcomes and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles based on D3 cell count in high-quality blastocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.