Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Precision of genetic parameters and breeding values estimated in marker assisted BLUP genetic evaluation.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 4 Mar 2009

Neuner Stefan, Edel Christian, Emmerling Reiner, Thaller Georg, Götz Kay-Uwe

Abstract excerpt

In practical implementations of marker-assisted selection economic and logistic restrictions frequently lead to incomplete genotypic data for the animals of interest. This may result in bias and larger standard errors of the estimated parameters and, as a consequence, reduce the benefits of applying marker-assisted selection. Our study examines the impact of the following factors: phenotypic information, depth of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genetic Markers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 19284530
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-26
PMCID: PMC2657907

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Precision of genetic parameters and breeding values estimated in marker assisted BLUP genetic evaluation.PMID 19284530Read ↗

Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: The combined use of linkage disequilibrium-based haploblocks and allele frequency-based haplotype selection methods enhances genomic evaluation accuracy in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.