Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Are you a lumper or a splitter?

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology - 1 Nov 2006

Ledger William J, Witkin Steven S

Abstract excerpt

The current goal of evidence-based medicine, prospective therapeutic interventions in large numbers of patients, may not always reach an accurate conclusion. Individual variations in genetic characteristics need to be acknowledged and taken into account in the analysis. Some women with recurrent vulvo-vaginal candiosis (RVVC) have polymorphisms in genes that directly contribute to their increased susceptibility...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Candidiasis
Share to Evidence-Based Medicine
Share to Microbiological Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mothers

Share to Multicenter Studies as Topic

Share to Obstetric Labor, Premature

Share to Pregnancy Complications, Infectious

Share to Research Design

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 16723100
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.098

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Are you a lumper or a splitter?PMID 16723100Read ↗

Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: a Dynamic Interkingdom Biofilm Disease of Candida and LactobacillusSemantic proximity Read ↗

My doc wants me to have another genotype panel. The HMO will not pay for this test. Last time, it cost my lover and me more than $900 from a lab in California. Do you know of some less costly providers of genotype tests? $900 is a lot of money! And do you have any information on when (if ever) the FDA is going to approve these tests, so the insurance companies will pay for them?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Uncovering the role of genetic polymorphisms in cervical insufficiency.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Basis for Recurrent Vulvo-Vaginal CandidiasisSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comprehensive in Silico Analysis of Regulatory SNPs of Human CLEC7A Gene and Its Validation as Genotypic and Phenotypic Disease Marker in Recurrent Vulvovaginal Infections.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotyping reveals no link between Candida albicans genotype and vaginitis severity in Turkish women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cohort Profile: Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy genetics consortium (NVP Genetics Consortium).Semantic proximity Read ↗

A meta-analysis of mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphisms with the risk of recurrent vulvovaginal infections.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Analysis of the frequencies of genotype combinations of 4 polymorphisms of genes acting on the folate cycle in the Spanish population].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype of Candida species associated with different conditions of vulvovaginal candidosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The role of gene-environment interaction in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.