Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS

1 May 1992

Abstract excerpt

Abstract Cytogenetic data are presented for 11 473 chorionic villus sampling (CVS) procedures from nine centres in the U.S. NICHD collaborative study. A successful cytogenetic diagnosis was obtained in 99.7 per cent of cases, with data obtained from the direct method only (26 per cent), culture method only (42 per cent), or a combination of both (32 per cent). A total of 1.1 per cent of patients had a second CVS...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 1523201
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970120503

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVSPMID 1523201Read ↗

The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. collaborative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cytogenetic analysis of 2928 CVS samples and 1075 amniocenteses from randomized studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)—diagnostic consequences of CVS Mosaicism and non-Mosaic Discrepancy in Centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986–1992Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi for prenatal diagnosis: An ACC collaborative study of U.K. dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions using semi‐direct analysis of chorionic villi samples detects the broadest spectrum of chromosome abnormalitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rare autosomal trisomies: comparison of detection through cell‐free DNA analysis and direct chromosome preparation of chorionic villus samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of a chromosomally mosaic placenta to assess the cell populations in dissociated chorionic villi: implications for QF‐PCR aneuploidy testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Complete discrepancy between QF‐PCR analysis of uncultured villi and karyotyping of cultured cells in the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in three CVSSemantic proximity Read ↗

The type of feto‐placental aneuploidy detected by cfDNA testing may influence the choice of confirmatory diagnostic procedureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Correlation between rare chromosomal abnormalities and prenatal ultrasound findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence of mosaicism in uncultured chorionic villus samples after chromosomal microarray and clinical outcome in pregnancies affected by confined placental mosaicismSemantic proximity Read ↗

European collaborative research on mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC)—fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.