Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cost comparison of predictive genetic testing versus conventional clinical screening for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Gut - 1 May 1999

Bapat B, Noorani H, Cohen Z, Berk T, Mitri A, Gallie B, Pritzker K, Gallinger S, Detsky A S

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Mutations of the APC gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a hereditary colorectal cancer predisposition syndrome. AIMS: To conduct a cost comparison analysis of predictive genetic testing versus conventional clinical screening for individuals at risk of inheriting FAP, using the perspective of a third party payer. METHODS: All direct health care costs for both screening strategies were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
Share to Child

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Decision Support Techniques

Share to Genes, APC

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Health Care Costs

Share to Mass Screening

Share to Ontario

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 10205208
DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.5.698
PMCID: PMC1727488

Genes

FAP
APC

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cost comparison of predictive genetic testing versus conventional clinical screening for familial adenomatous polyposis.PMID 10205208Read ↗

Cost-minimization analysis of genetic testing versus clinical screening of at-risk relatives for familial adenomatous polyposis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Economic evaluation of the familial cancer programme in Western Australia: predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Next-Generation Sequencing Panels for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis Syndromes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-effectiveness of pancreatic cancer screening in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A decision-analytic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic screening by DNA technology: a systematic review of health economic evidence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The use of gene tests to detect hereditary predisposition to cancer: economic considerations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-effectiveness of microsatellite instability screening as a method for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.