Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic techniques for identification of unusual aerobic pathogenic gram-negative bacilli.

Journal of clinical microbiology - 1 Dec 1998

Tang Y W, Ellis N M, Hopkins M K, Smith D H, Dodge D E, Persing D H

Abstract excerpt

Rapid and accurate identification of bacterial pathogens is a fundamental goal of clinical microbiology, but one that is difficult or impossible for many slow-growing and fastidious organisms. We used identification systems based on cellular fatty acid profiles (Sherlock; MIDI, Inc., Newark, Del.), carbon source utilization (Microlog; Biolog, Inc., Hayward, Calif.), and 16S rRNA gene sequence (MicroSeq;...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Carbon
Share to DNA, Ribosomal
Share to Fatty Acids

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria

Share to Phenotype

Share to RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 9817894
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3674-3679.1998
PMCID: PMC105261

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic techniques for identification of unusual aerobic pathogenic gram-negative bacilli.PMID 9817894Read ↗

Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection and Identification of Microorganisms by Gene Amplification and SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Application of SmartGene IDNS Software to Partial 16S rRNA Gene Sequences for a Diverse Group of Bacteria in a Clinical LaboratorySemantic proximity Read ↗

Genotypic diversity of anaerobic isolates from bloodstream infections.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid bacterial identification by direct PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes using the MinION™ nanopore sequencerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer to BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification of Gram-Negative BacilliSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimization of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Bacterial IdentificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Automated Broad-Range Molecular Detection of Bacteria in Clinical SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Use of the MicroSeq 500 16S rRNA Gene-Based Sequencing for Identification of Bacterial Isolates That Commercial Automated Systems Failed To Identify CorrectlySemantic proximity Read ↗

Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S Ribosomal DNA-Based Bacterial Identification System for Identification of Clinically Significant Bacterial Isolates with Ambiguous Biochemical ProfilesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct Comparison of the BD Phoenix System with the MicroScan WalkAway System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Nonfermentative Gram-Negative OrganismsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the Biolog OmniLog Identification System and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for accuracy in identification of atypical bacteria of clinical originSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.