Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods.

Journal of andrology - 1 Jan 2000

Davis R O, Gravance C G

Abstract excerpt

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently suggested new morphometric dimensions for normal sperm heads and new sperm head classification rules. These specifications differ from previous WHO methods and from the Kruger method for strict morphology assessment. We analyzed the WHO and Kruger sperm classification rules to determine their appropriateness as predictive linear models. We reviewed the theoretical...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Spermatozoa
Share to Classification
Share to Infertility, Male

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Methods

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 8188540

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods.PMID 8188540Read ↗

Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Variability in the morphologic assessment of human sperm: use of the strict criteria recommended by the World Health Organization in 2010Semantic proximity Read ↗

Normal sperm head morphometric reference values in fertile Asian malesSemantic proximity Read ↗

‘How to count sperm properly’: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Andrology: Semen parameters as predictors of in-vitro fertilization: the importance of strict criteria sperm morphologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Automatic classification of human sperm head morphologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human SemenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Variation in mean human sperm length is linked with semen characteristicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Morphometric analysis of human sperm morphologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the Sperm-Class Analyzer® computer-assisted systemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human sperm head morphometric distribution and its influence on human fertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.