Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Multiple AMMI models investigation to decipher the genotype by environment (G×E) interaction in sugarcane interspecific hybrids for yield and quality traits.

Scientific reports - 16 Feb 2026

Durai A Anna, Kona Praveen, Pazhany Adhini S, Gopinath K

Abstract excerpt

Genotype × Environment interaction for yield and quality traits was studied in 19 sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) genotypes, including 16 test entries and three varieties, assessed using a Randomized Block Design with three replications at Ponni Sugars, Erode, during 2023-24 and 2024-25 as first plant, second plant and ratoon crops. Combined ANOVA revealed significant genotype and environmental effects, with notable G...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to CCS gene
Share to Gene-Environment Interaction

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Hybridization, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Saccharum

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 41698962
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-32392-1
PMCID: PMC13003137

Genes

CCS

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Multiple AMMI models investigation to decipher the genotype by environment (G×E) interaction in sugarcane interspecific hybrids for yield and quality traits.PMID 41698962Read ↗

AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for genotype × environment interactions affecting the yield and quality characteristics of sugar beet.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unraveling genotypic interactions in sugar beet for enhanced yield stability and trait associations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment interaction components underlying variations in root, sugar and white sugar yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Semantic proximity Read ↗

AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trails (METs).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection for high-yielding sugarcane ideotypes and multi-trait selection via MGIDI across different harvesting periods improves sugar quality and yield.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Stability analysis and selection of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes using AMMI, BLUP, GGE biplot and MTSI.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype × environment interaction insights for yield and yield components in castor via AMMI and GGE biplot models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selecting sugarcane genotypes by the selection index reveals high gain for technological quality traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of yield and stability of sugar beet (beta vulgaris L.) genotypes using GGE biplot and AMMI analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment and genotype by yield*trait interactions in sugar beet: analyzing yield stability and determining key traits association.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interaction in cassava multi-environment trials via analytic factor.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic divergence for adaptability and stability in sugarcane: Proposal for a more accurate evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.