Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing computable type 2 diabetes phenotype definitions in identifying populations of interest for clinical research.

BMJ health & care informatics - 22 Oct 2025

Sood Priyanka D, Liu Star, Kalyani Rita R, Kharrazi Hadi

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: Significant variations exist in computable phenotype definitions to identify patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using electronic health records (EHRs). These variations cause challenges in identifying T2D populations for clinical research. To address these challenges, this study compares the variations in common phenotypes in identifying patients with T2D using EHRs. METHODS: A retrospective data...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Biomedical Research
Share to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Electronic Health Records

Share to DDC gene

Share to Phenotype

Share to United States

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 41125310
DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101378
PMCID: PMC12548627

Genes

DDC

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing computable type 2 diabetes phenotype definitions in identifying populations of interest for clinical research.PMID 41125310Read ↗

A comparison of phenotype definitions for diabetes mellitus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing electronic health record phenotypes against gold-standard diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Measuring the Impact of Data Quality and Computable Phenotypes on Potential Racial Disparities in Predicting Healthcare Utilization Among Type 2 Diabetes Populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Equivalence of Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence Estimates: Comparative Study of Similar Phenotyping Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Developing a Computable Phenotype for Identifying Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Diabetes Using Electronic Health Records in the DiCAYA Network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A reproducible open-source framework for defining type 1 and type 2 diabetes research cohorts in routinely collected electronic health record dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Developing an automated algorithm for identification of children and adolescents with diabetes using electronic health records from the OneFlorida+ clinical research network.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying type 1 and 2 diabetes in population level data: assessing the accuracy of published approachesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of diverse electronic medical record systems to identify genetic risk for type 2 diabetes within a genome-wide association study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Machine Learning-based Framework to Identify Type 2 Diabetes through Electronic Health RecordsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond Phecodes: leveraging PheMAP to identify patients lacking diagnosis codes in electronic health records.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.