Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions

28 May 2024

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of ChatGPT 4 (GPT-4) in delivering genetic information about BRCA1, HFE, and MLH1, building on previous findings with ChatGPT 3.5 (GPT-3.5). To focus on assessing the utility, limitations, and ethical implications of using ChatGPT in medical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured survey was developed to assess GPT-4's clinical value. An expert panel of genetic...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 38872284
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae128

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questionsPMID 38872284Read ↗

Evaluating ChatGPT as an Agent for Providing Genetic EducationSemantic proximity Read ↗

An analysis of AI platforms: Can AI provide genetics education?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of ChatGPT in Medical GeneticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots in Genetic Counseling Practice: Current Uptake, Utilization, and PerspectivesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Democratizing genomics: Leveraging software to make genetics an integral part of routine careSemantic proximity Read ↗

Hereditary Cancer Risk Using a Genetic Chatbot Before Routine Care Visits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the Rosa Chatbot Providing Genetic Information to Patients at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Qualitative Interview Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient Interactions With an Automated Conversational Agent Delivering Pretest Genetics Education: Descriptive StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

To what extent does ChatGPT understand genetics?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Responses of AI Chatbots to Testosterone Replacement Therapy: Patient's Beware!Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: a Prompt Engineering StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

“Development and Implementation of Novel Chatbot-based Genomic Research Consent”Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.