Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of four different human papillomavirus genotyping methods in cervical samples: Addressing method-specific advantages and limitations

30 Jan 2024

Abstract excerpt

Since human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized as the causative agent of cervical cancer and associated with anogenital non-cervical and oropharyngeal cancers, the characterization of the HPV types circulating in different geographic regions is an important tool in screening and prevention. In this context, this study compared four methodologies for HPV detection and genotyping: real-time PCR (Cobas® HPV test),...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 38327440
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25474

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 15 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of four different human papillomavirus genotyping methods in cervical samples: Addressing method-specific advantages and limitationsPMID 38327440Read ↗

Molecular detection and genotyping of human papillomavirus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A direct comparison of four high risk human papilloma virus tests versus the cobas test for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical significance of human papillomavirus genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Human Papillomavirus Screening: Design and Targeting of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Prevalence of HPV Genotypes Detected by Cobas HPV in Cervical Samples among Unvaccinated Women from Isfahan Province, IranSemantic proximity Read ↗

Retrospective analysis of HPV infection: Cotesting and HPV genotyping in cervical cancer screening within a large academic health care system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Current Updates on Cancer-Causing Types of Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) in East, Southeast, and South AsiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular tests potentially improving HPV screening and genotyping for cervical cancer preventionSemantic proximity Read ↗

High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Prevalence and Genotype Distribution in Two Opportunistic Cervical Screening Periods in Spain: A Tertiary Hospital-Based Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evolution and classification of oncogenic human papillomavirus types and variants associated with cervical cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and validation of a multiplex qPCR method for identification of high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development and validation of a multiplex qPCR method for identification of high risk genotypes of human papillomavirusSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.