Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Moral justification for the use of ‘add-ons’ in assisted reproductive technology: experts’ views and experiences

22 Oct 2023

Abstract excerpt

RESEARCH QUESTION: What factors do assisted reproductive terchnology (ART) providers take into account when they make decisions about offering 'add-ons'? DESIGN: A qualitative analysis of interviews with 31 ART professionals, focusing on their views and experiences in relation to add-ons, including the factors that are considered when doctors make decisions about their use. RESULTS: The participants reported that...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 38185024
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103637

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Moral justification for the use of ‘add-ons’ in assisted reproductive technology: experts’ views and experiencesPMID 38185024Read ↗

Patient and professional perspectives about using in vitro fertilisation add-ons in the UK and Australia: a qualitative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in humans: Facts and uncertaintiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choosing Wisely Canada: Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society’s List of Top Items Physicians and Patients Should Question in Fertility MedicineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reducing the number of fetuses in a pregnancy: providers’ and patients’ views of challengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Amel Alghrani, Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technologies – New HorizonsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical issues in therapeutic use and research in pregnant and breastfeeding womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

`Human clones talk about their lives': media representations of assisted reproductive and biogenetic technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Vasectomy provider decision-making balancing autonomy and non-maleficence: qualitative interviews with providersSemantic proximity Read ↗

The provision of information on time-lapse imaging: A systematic analysis of UK fertility clinics websitesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Lay Persons Views On Current And Novel Methods Of Fertility Assessment And Supporting Conception: A Qualitative StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.