Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Morphology of inner cell mass: a better predictive biomarker of blastocyst viability

26 Aug 2022

Abstract excerpt

Background Transfer of embryos at the blastocyst stage is one of the best approaches for achieving a higher success rate in In vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment as it demonstrates an improved uterine and embryonic synchrony at implantation. Despite novel biochemical and genetic markers proposed for the prediction of embryo viability in recent years, the conventional morphological grading of blastocysts remains...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive System and Pregnancy

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36046502
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13935

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 22 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Morphology of inner cell mass: a better predictive biomarker of blastocyst viabilityPMID 36046502Read ↗

Overall Blastocyst Quality, Trophectoderm Grade, and Inner Cell Mass Grade Predict Pregnancy Outcome in Euploid Blastocyst Transfer CyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of live birth in vitrified-warmed 1PN-derived blastocyst transfer: Overall quality grade, ICM, TE, and expansion degreeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Does conventional morphological evaluation still play a role in predicting blastocyst formation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Transcriptomic signatures in trophectoderm and inner cell mass of human blastocysts classified according to developmental potential, maternal age and morphologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Does Conventional Morphological Evaluation Still Play a Role in Predicting Blastocyst Formation?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Association between the quality of inner cell mass and first trimester miscarriage after single blastocyst transfer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Grade of the inner cell mass, but not trophectoderm, predicts live birth in fresh blastocyst single transfersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Transcriptomic signatures in trophectoderm and inner cell mass of human blastocysts with different expectations of pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): a national studySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.