Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The impact of changing home blood pressure monitoring cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on hypertension phenotypes.

Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) - 1 Jul 2021

Feitosa Audes D M, Mota-Gomes Marco A, Barroso Weimar S, Miranda Roberto D, Barbosa Eduardo C D, Brandão Andréa A, Nobre Fernando, Mion Decio, Amodeo Celso, Lima-Filho José L, Sposito Andrei C, Nadruz Wilson

Abstract excerpt

This study investigated the impact of changing abnormal home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on the prevalence of hypertension phenotypes, considering an abnormal office blood pressure cutoff of 140/90 mmHg. We evaluated 57 768 individuals (26 876 untreated and 30 892 treated with antihypertensive medications) from 719 Brazilian centers who performed HBPM. Changing the HBPM...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Blood Pressure
Share to Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Hypertension

Share to Phenotype

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33955645
DOI: 10.1111/jch.14261
PMCID: PMC8678775

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The impact of changing home blood pressure monitoring cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on hypertension phenotypes.PMID 33955645Read ↗

Identification of Hypertension Phenotypes by Sex: A Real-World Study of 7,852 Treated Patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relationship between blood pressure variability and blood pressure phenotypes: a home blood pressure monitoring studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of cardiovascular risk in individuals with normal vs isolated elevated diastolic blood pressureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pediatrics, an Update on Interpretation and Classification of Hypertension Phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Correlates of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Phenotypes at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Turkey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Different Hypertensive Phenotypes According to the 2023 ESH GuidelinesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Excluding the “load” criterion substantially decreases the prevalence of hypertension diagnosed by ABPM: Data from a middle-income country birth cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Count-Based Binary Decision Method For Target Blood Pressure Achievement in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Data Interpretation For Clinical PracticesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements in Waiting Room or Isolated Room for Diagnosis and Phenotyping of Hypertension.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes and isolated elevation of office central or brachial blood pressure.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical characterization of blood pressure phenotypes: the BP phenotype score.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Tight versus standard blood pressure control on the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke: An observational retrospective cohort study in the general ambulatory settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.