Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Affecting future individuals: Why and when germline genome editing entails a greater moral obligation towards progeny

2 Apr 2021

Abstract excerpt

Assisted reproductive technologies have greatly increased our control over reproductive choices, leading some bioethicists to argue that we face unprecedented moral obligations towards progeny. Several models attempting to balance the principle of procreative autonomy with these obligations have been proposed. The least demanding is the minimal threshold model (MTM), according to which every reproductive choice...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Share to Organ Donation and Transplantation
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33811352
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12871

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Affecting future individuals: Why and when germline genome editing entails a greater moral obligation towards progenyPMID 33811352Read ↗

Human Germline Genome Editing: On the Nature of Our Reasons to Genome EditSemantic proximity Read ↗

Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Germline gene editing and the precautionary principleSemantic proximity Read ↗

The case for a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis for medical benefit.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How will new genetic technologies, such as gene editing, change reproductive decision-making? Views of high-risk couples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating Demand for Germline Genome Editing: An In Vitro Fertilization Clinic PerspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

Procreative Beneficence and Genetic EnhancementSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reasons and Reproduction: Gene Editing and Genetic SelectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reproductive Embryo Editing: Attending to JusticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Legal reflections on the case of genome-edited babiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.