Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale.

Ecology letters - 1 Jun 2021

Paz-Vinas Ivan, Jensen Evelyn L, Bertola Laura D, Breed Martin F, Hand Brian K, Hunter Margaret E, Kershaw Francine, Leigh Deborah M, Luikart Gordon, Mergeay Joachim, Miller Joshua M, Van Rees Charles B, Segelbacher Gernot, Hoban Sean

Abstract excerpt

Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55-67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA, Mitochondrial
Share to Ecology

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genetic Variation

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33749962
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13732

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale.PMID 33749962Read ↗

Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An Anthropocene map of genetic diversity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Large future genetic diversity losses are predicted from conservation indicators even with habitat protection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Worldwide impacts of humans on animal genetic diversitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Global meta-analysis shows action is needed to halt genetic diversity loss.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity loss in the Anthropocene.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Six percent loss of genetic variation in wild populations since the industrial revolutionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Global assessment of effective population sizes: consistent taxonomic differences in meeting the 50/500 ruleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-Locus Nuclear Marker Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Swiss Orthoptera Unveils Conservation Status Limitations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Geographical range size and latitude predict population genetic structure in a global survey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating global genetic diversity loss.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.