Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.

PLoS genetics - 1 Feb 2021

Garud Nandita R, Messer Philipp W, Petrov Dmitri A

Abstract excerpt

Whether hard sweeps or soft sweeps dominate adaptation has been a matter of much debate. Recently, we developed haplotype homozygosity statistics that (i) can detect both hard and soft sweeps with similar power and (ii) can classify the detected sweeps as hard or soft. The application of our method to population genomic data from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster (DGRP) allowed us to rediscover...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Drosophila melanogaster

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Evolution, Molecular

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Genomics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33635910
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009373
PMCID: PMC7946363

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.PMID 33635910Read ↗

Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and virusesSemantic proximity Read ↗

S/HIC: Robust identification of soft and hard sweeps using machine learningSemantic proximity Read ↗

A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient EurasiansSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection and classification of hard and soft sweeps from unphased genotypes by multilocus genotype identitySemantic proximity Read ↗

A genome-wide Approximate Bayesian Computation approach suggests only limited numbers of soft sweeps in humans over the last 100,000 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

diploS/HIC: An Updated Approach to Classifying Selective Sweeps.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A likelihood approach for uncovering selective sweep signatures from haplotype dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying and classifying shared selective sweeps from multilocus dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Versatile detection of diverse selective sweeps with Flex-sweepSemantic proximity Read ↗

Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweepsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.