Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing

1 Oct 2020

Abstract excerpt

was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Share to CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Share to Xenotransplantation and immune response

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33095048
DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome EditingPMID 33095048Read ↗

Heritable human genome editing: Research progress, ethical considerations, and hurdles to clinical practiceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human germline gene editing: Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRESemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethics of Human Genome EditingSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Clinical Application of Gene Editing: Ethical and Social IssuesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Risks and benefits of human germline genome editing: An ethical analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humansSemantic proximity Read ↗

Regulatory framework of human germline and heritable genome editing in China: a comparison with the United States and the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human Genome Editing and Ethical ConsiderationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Geneva Statement on Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Need for Course CorrectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

What do we do now?: Responding to claims of germline gene editing in humansSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human germline genome editing and broad societal consensusSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.