Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes

11 Aug 2020

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Do donor oocyte recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER: PGT-A did not improve the likelihood of live birth for recipients of vitrified donor oocytes, but it did avoid embryo transfer in cycles with no euploid embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Relative to slow freeze, oocyte vitrification has led to increased live birth from cryopreserved...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33057600
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa219

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomesPMID 33057600Read ↗

Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score designSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy failed to improve cumulative live birth rate in patients with limited good-quality embryos: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Could Not Improve Cumulative Live Birth Rate Among 705 Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation FailureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the impact of both Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy with blastocyst morphologic grade on live birth rates in frozen embryo transfers from fresh and frozen donor oocytesSemantic proximity Read ↗

No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for AneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Results and Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing: A Retrospective Analysis of 2577 Embryo BiopsiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.