Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors

6 Oct 2020

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Human genome editing technologies offer much potential benefit. However, central to any conversation relating to the application of such technologies are certain ethical, legal, and social difficulties around their application. The recent misuse, or inappropriate use, by certain Chinese actors of the application of genome editing technologies has been, of late, well noted and described. Consequently,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biotechnology and Related Fields
Share to CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Share to Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33023591
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00527-w

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actorsPMID 33023591Read ↗

Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginarySemantic proximity Read ↗

Regulatory framework of human germline and heritable genome editing in China: a comparison with the United States and the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rewriting the human genome, rewriting human rights law? Human rights, human dignity, and human germline modification in the CRISPR eraSemantic proximity Read ↗

REGULATING GENOME EDITING UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWSemantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking the unthinkable: how did human germline genome editing become ethically acceptable?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rogues and Regulation of Germline EditingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Debating Ethical Issues in Genome Editing TechnologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Regulating germline editing in assisted reproductive technology: An EU cross‐disciplinary perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human genome editing after the “CRISPR babies”: The double-pacing problem and collaborative governanceSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Human Right to Science and the Regulation of Human Germline EngineeringSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.