Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it?

1 Oct 2020

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 33010940
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.003

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it?PMID 33010940Read ↗

Single-embryo transfer: a key strategy to reduce the risk for multiple pregnancy in assisted human reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The multiple gestation epidemic: the role of the assisted reproductive technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

High rates of embryonic loss, yet high incidence of multiple births in human art: is this paradoxical?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Revisiting serum β-hCG cut-off levels and pregnancy outcomes using single embryo transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemicSemantic proximity Read ↗

Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effectiveness and safety of consecutive single embryo transfer compared to double embryo transfer: results from the UK HFEA registrySemantic proximity Read ↗

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and qualitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged >40 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Association between oocyte donors’ or recipients’ body mass index and clinical outcomes after first single blastocyst transfers—the uterus is the most affectedSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.