Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs’: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening

20 May 2020

Abstract excerpt

Publics are key stakeholders in population genomic screening and their perspectives on ethical considerations are relevant to programme design and policy making. Using semi-structured interviews, we explored social views and attitudes towards possible future provision of personalised genomic risk information to populations to inform prevention and/or early detection of relevant conditions. Participants were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32434901
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105934

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs’: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screeningPMID 32434901Read ↗

GP attitudes to and expectations for providing personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the Potential Emotional and Behavioural Impact of Providing Personalised Genomic Risk Information to the Public: A Focus Group Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetics and genomics in cancer: A scoping review and narrative synthesisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perceptions of genetic research and testing among members of families with an increased risk of malignant melanoma.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic/Genomic Testing: Defining The Parameters For Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anticipated uptake of genetic testing for familial melanoma in an Australian sample: An exploratory study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychological and ethical issues raised by genomic in paediatric care pathway, a qualitative analysis with parents and childhood cancer patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Consumers' views on ethical issues in genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.