Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel

28 Jan 2020

Abstract excerpt

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO)...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Share to Streptococcal Infections and Treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31996444
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01730-19

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive PanelPMID 31996444Read ↗

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream InfectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multicenter Evaluation of a PCR-Based Digital Microfluidics and Electrochemical Detection System for the Rapid Identification of 15 Fungal Pathogens Directly from Positive Blood CulturesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of ePlex® blood culture identification panels in clinical isolates and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood culturesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multicenter Evaluation of the BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Detection of Bacteria, Yeasts, and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Culture SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the diagnosis of bloodstream infectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multicenter Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Pathogen Detection in Bloodstream InfectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a Microarray-Based Assay for Rapid Identification of Gram-Positive Organisms and Resistance Markers in Positive Blood CulturesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the Nanosphere Verigene BC-GN Assay for Direct Identification of Gram-Negative Bacilli and Antibiotic Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures and Potential Impact for More-Rapid Antibiotic InterventionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of the Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Assay for Rapid Detection of Bacteria and Resistance DeterminantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multiplex Identification of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Resistance Determinants Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broths: Evaluation of an Automated Microarray-Based Nucleic Acid TestSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.