Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A head-to-head evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy and costs of trio versus singleton exome sequencing analysis

18 Jul 2019

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 31320747
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0471-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A head-to-head evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy and costs of trio versus singleton exome sequencing analysisPMID 31320747Read ↗

Evaluating Genome Sequencing Strategies: Trio, Singleton, and Standard Testing in Rare Disease DiagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Long-term economic impacts of exome sequencing for suspected monogenic disorders: diagnosis, management, and reproductive outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reducing diagnostic turnaround times of exome sequencing for families requiring timely diagnosesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Determinants of DNA-sequence-based Diagnostic Yield in the CSER ConsortiumSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cost-Effectiveness of Exome Sequencing versus Targeted Gene Panels for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Effusions and Non-Immune Hydrops FetalisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimal sequencing strategies for identifying disease-associated singletons.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implementation of a national prenatal exome sequencing service in England: cost-effectiveness analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic sequencing for the diagnosis of childhood mitochondrial disorders: a health economic evaluationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond the panel: preconception screening in consanguineous couples using the TruSight One “clinical exome”Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychological impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): TRIDENT-2 studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal genetic diagnosis on maternal psychological outcomes and decisional conflict in a prospective cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Integrating exome sequencing into a diagnostic pathway for epileptic encephalopathy: Evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.