Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population

21 Feb 2019

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 30790147
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01422-z

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general populationPMID 30790147Read ↗

Freezing of all embryos in in vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registrySemantic proximity Read ↗

There is no evidence that the time from egg retrieval to embryo transfer affects live birth rates in a freeze-all strategySemantic proximity Read ↗

Women may not benefit from repeated frozen embryo transfers: a retrospective analysis of the cumulative live birth rate of 43 972 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Major Factors Affecting the Live Birth Rate After Frozen Embryo Transfer Among Young WomenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged >40 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients–do we need more information?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

The details matter: personalized prediction of live birth after in vitro fertilization in women with polycystic ovary syndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting personalized cumulative live birth rate after a complete in vitro fertilization cycle: an analysis of 32,306 treatment cycles in ChinaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Growth Hormone Enhances Ovarian Response but not Live Births in DOR Patients Undergoing PPOS with Freeze-all Strategy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Contrasted with Kuntai CapsuleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Live Birth Rate of Fresh Embryo Transfer with GnRH Agonist Long Protocol is Higher Than Frozen Embryo TransferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Constructing a predictive model for live birth following fresh embryo transfer in antagonist protocol for polycystic ovary syndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.