Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies

12 Jan 2019

Abstract excerpt

When recruiting research participants through central cancer registries, high response fractions help ensure population-based representation. We conducted multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to identify case and study characteristics associated with making contact with and obtaining cooperation of Utah cancer cases using data from 17 unique recruitment efforts undertaken by the Utah Cancer Registry...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30689685
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz011

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based StudiesPMID 30689685Read ↗

Multilevel Factors Associated with Nonresponse to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Radiation Oncology CareSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors of enrollment into a familial cancer registry by individuals at high risk for BRCA1/2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Virtual Pooled Registry-Cancer Linkage System: an improved method for ascertaining cancer diagnosesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors for participation in DNA self-sampling of childhood cancer survivors in SwitzerlandSemantic proximity Read ↗

Enrollment in Children’s Oncology Group’s clinical trials: population-based linkage with the National Childhood Cancer RegistrySemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of late outcomes in Dutch childhood cancer survivors: methodology of the DCCSS LATER study part 2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Examining the Feasibility and Functionality of Common Analysis Methods for Longitudinal Data with Binary OutcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Promoting patient engagement in cancer genomics research programs: An environmental scanSemantic proximity Read ↗

Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening Adherence During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Cohort at Increased Inherited Cancer Risk in the United States.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The LOG-after French Childhood Cancer Cohort : acute to long-term follow-up. Methodology of the LOG-after cohort, a database to help in the medium- and long-term care of patients. A GOCE study (Grand Ouest Cancers de l’Enfant, Childhood Cancer, West France) plus other French hospitalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sex and Marital-Status Differences in Delayed Initiation for Pharyngeal Cancer Treatment, Before and After Medicaid ExpansionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Adequate Underrepresented Minority Representation in Cancer Trials: Evidence from an NCI-Designated Center in a Minority CountySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.