Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Sperm functional attributes and oviduct explant binding capacity differs between bulls with different fertility ratings in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

23 Aug 2018

Abstract excerpt

We report here the differences in sperm functional attributes and sperm-oviduct binding index in bulls with different field fertility ratings. Cryopreserved spermatozoa from Murrah buffalo bulls (n=9) with different fertility ratings were evaluated for membrane integrity, capacitation status, acrosome intactness and protein tyrosine phosphorylation status. Frozen--thawed spermatozoa were incubated with oviduct...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Sperm and Testicular Function

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30135005
DOI: 10.1071/rd17452

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Sperm functional attributes and oviduct explant binding capacity differs between bulls with different fertility ratings in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)PMID 30135005Read ↗

Review: Evaluation of bull fertility. Functional and molecular approachesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comprehensive functional analysis reveals that acrosome integrity and viability are key variables distinguishing artificial insemination bulls of varying fertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Spermatozoa with high mitochondrial membrane potential and low tyrosine phosphorylation preferentially bind to oviduct explants in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)Semantic proximity Read ↗

The future of assessing bull fertility: Can the ‘omics fields identify usable biomarkers?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sperm Binding to Epithelial Oviduct Explants in Bulls with Different Nonreturn Rates Investigated with a New In Vitro Model1Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sperm capacitation as a predictor of boar fertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

The usefulness of combining traditional sperm assessments with in vitro heterospermic insemination to identify bulls of low fertility as estimated in vivo.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Oviductal epithelial cells selected boar sperm according to their functional characteristicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of protein candidates in spermatozoa of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) bulls helps in predicting their fertility statusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Breeding Soundness Evaluation and Semen Analysis for Predicting Bull FertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approachSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of Capacitation on Bull Sperm Binding to Homologous Oviductal Epithelium1Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.