Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing deregression methods for genomic prediction of test-day traits in dairy cattle.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Apr 2018

de Oliveira H R, Silva F F, Brito L F, Guarini A R, Jamrozik J, Schenkel F S

Abstract excerpt

We aimed to investigate the performance of three deregression methods (VanRaden, VR; Wiggans, WG; and Garrick, GR) of cows' and bulls' breeding values to be used as pseudophenotypes in the genomic evaluation of test-day dairy production traits. Three scenarios were considered within each deregression method: (i) including only animals with reliability of estimated breeding value (RELEBV ) higher than the average...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Fertility

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29484718
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12317

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing deregression methods for genomic prediction of test-day traits in dairy cattle.PMID 29484718Read ↗

Validation of simultaneous deregression of cow and bull breeding values and derivation of appropriate weights.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of genomically enhanced and parent average breeding values with cow performance in Nordic dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy and bias of genomic prediction with different de-regression methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of cow reference group on validation reliability of genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Different methods to calculate genomic predictions--comparisons of BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.