Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo

6 Jun 2017

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: How does automated time-lapse annotation (Eeva™) compare to manual annotation of the same video images performed by embryologists certified in measuring durations of the 2-cell (P2; time to the 3-cell minus time to the 2-cell, or t3-t2) and 3-cell (P3; time to 4-cell minus time to the 3-cell, or t4-t3) stages? SUMMARY ANSWER: Manual annotation was superior to the automated annotation provided by...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28854587
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex229

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryoPMID 28854587Read ↗

Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user groupSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development of automated annotation software for human embryo morphokineticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potentialSemantic proximity Read ↗

External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpointSemantic proximity Read ↗

Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapseSemantic proximity Read ↗

A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo developmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

The clinical use of time-lapse in human-assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Delineating the heterogeneity of embryo preimplantation development using automated and accurate morphokinetic annotationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Developmental perturbation in human embryos: Clinical and biological significance learned from time‐lapse imagesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScopeTM) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot studySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.