Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

How much have we learned from time-lapse in clinical IVF?

19 Sept 2016

Abstract excerpt

Can the time-lapse system (TLS) identify the best embryo for transfer? Although there are several studies that support this hypothesis, more research is required to improve the quality of the current evidence and also to assess live birth rate, miscarriage, stillbirth or clinical pregnancy in order to choose between a TLS or conventional incubation. In addition, although some authors report on effectiveness and...

Topics

Join the communities discussing this publication.

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Renal and related cancers
Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 27645282
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaw056

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How much have we learned from time-lapse in clinical IVF?PMID 27645282Read ↗

The clinical use of time-lapse in human-assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubatorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user groupSemantic proximity Read ↗

Developmental perturbation in human embryos: Clinical and biological significance learned from time‐lapse imagesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCTSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimisation of the timing of fertilisation assessment for oocytes cultured in standard incubation: lessons learnt from time-lapse imaging of 78 348 embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScopeTM) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Time-lapse monitoring technologies for the selection of bovine in vitro fertilized embryos with high implantation potentialSemantic proximity Read ↗

What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Interaction between gene expression and morphokinetic parameters in undisturbed human embryo cultureSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.