Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention.

Journal of behavioral medicine - 1 Oct 2015

Aspinwall Lisa G, Stump Tammy K, Taber Jennifer M, Kohlmann Wendy, Leaf Samantha L, Leachman Sancy A

Abstract excerpt

To determine whether receiving melanoma genetic test results undermines perceived control over melanoma prevention, control-related beliefs were examined among 60 adults from melanoma-prone families receiving CDKN2A/p16 test results (27 unaffected noncarriers, 15 unaffected carriers, 18 affected carriers; response rate at 2 years = 64.9 % of eligible respondents). Multilevel modeling of perceived control ratings...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Internal-External Control

Share to Melanoma

Share to Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant

Share to Skin Neoplasms

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 25822116
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9631-8
PMCID: PMC4568125

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention.PMID 25822116Read ↗

Patterns of photoprotection following CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting and counseling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Melanoma genetic testing, counseling, and adherence to skin cancer prevention and detection behaviors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing for melanoma risk: a prospective cohort study of uptake and outcomes among Australian families.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Test Reporting and Counseling for Melanoma Risk in Minors May Improve Sun Protection Without Inducing Distress.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perceived intrafamily melanoma risk communication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Considerations for Germline Testing in Melanoma: Updates in Behavioral Change and Pancreatic Surveillance for Carriers of CDKN2A Pathogenic VariantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Anticipated uptake of genetic testing for familial melanoma in an Australian sample: An exploratory study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High- and average-risk individuals' beliefs about, and perceptions of, malignant melanoma: an Australian perspective.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.