Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy - 1 Aug 2015

Christenhusz Gabrielle M, Devriendt Koenraad, Van Esch Hilde, Dierickx Kris

Abstract excerpt

While ethical and empirical interest in so-called secondary variants and incidental findings in clinical genetics contexts is growing, critical reflection on the ethical foundations of the various recommendations proposed is thus far largely lacking. We examine and critique the ethical justificat...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Communication
Share to Disclosure
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genetics, Medical

Share to Incidental Findings

Share to Physician-Patient Relations

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25407129
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9611-8

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-25407129-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.PMID 25407129Read ↗

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reflecting on Earlier Experiences with Unsolicited Findings: Points to Consider for Next‐Generation Sequencing and Informed Consent in DiagnosticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practiceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic informationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental Findings from Clinical Genome‐Wide Sequencing: A ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in minors for adult‐onset genetic diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Am I My Family's Keeper? Disclosure Dilemmas in Next-Generation SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.