Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities by First Trimester Combined Screening and Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

25 Sept 2014

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: To examine combined first trimester screening (FTS), noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and a two-step policy that combines FTS and NIPT in screening for aneuploidy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study involving 21,052 pregnancies where FTS was performed at the Praxis Praenatal.de in Duesseldorf, Germany. In each case, the sum risk of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 was computed. We assumed that NIPT...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25255236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385059

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities by First Trimester Combined Screening and Noninvasive Prenatal TestingPMID 25255236Read ↗

Accuracy of first‐trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combined First Trimester Screening and Cell-Free Fetal DNA – “Next Generation Screening”Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combined first‐trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPTSemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice – An audit of <scp>NIPT</scp> and combined first‐trimester screening in an unselected Australian populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential diagnostic consequences of applying non‐invasive prenatal testing: population‐based study from a country with existing first‐trimester screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Routine first‐trimester screening for fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy: cell‐free DNA test contingent on results from combined testSemantic proximity Read ↗

Replacing the Combined Test by Cell-Free DNA Testing in Screening for Trisomies 21, 18 and 13: Impact on the Diagnosis of Other Chromosomal AbnormalitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Contingent first‐trimester screening for aneuploidies with cell‐free DNA in a Danish clinical settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

First trimester screening for other trisomies than trisomy 21, 18, and 13Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> analysis of maternal blood at 10–11 weeks' gestation and the combined test at 11–13 weeksSemantic proximity Read ↗

First trimester combined screening for fetal aneuploidies enhanced with additional ultrasound markers: an 8-year prospective study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal diagnostic testing and atypical chromosome abnormalities following combined first‐trimester screening: implications for contingent models of non‐invasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.