Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Experiential knowledge of disability, impairment and illness: The reproductive decisions of families genetically at risk.

Health (London, England : 1997) - 1 Sept 2014

Boardman Felicity

Abstract excerpt

As the capacities of Reproductive Genetic Technologies expand, would-be parents face an increasing number of reproductive decisions regarding testing and screening for different conditions. Several studies have acknowledged the role that 'experiential knowledge of disability' plays in arriving at decisions around the use of these technologies; however, there is a lack of clarity within this literature as to what...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Decision Making
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Interviews as Topic

Share to Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

Share to Risk Factors

Share to United Kingdom

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24203398
DOI: 10.1177/1363459313507588

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Experiential knowledge of disability, impairment and illness: The reproductive decisions of families genetically at risk.PMID 24203398Read ↗

Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically 'risky' reproductive decisions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What is a ‘serious’ genetic condition? The perceptions of people living with genetic conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: a response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Social dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a literature reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reproduction and Genetic Responsibility: An Interpretive Description of Reproductive Decision-Making for Young People With Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disability, Genetic Counseling, and Medical Education: From Eugenics to Anti-AbleismSemantic proximity Read ↗

Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me”: Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing InequitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Counseling for Prenatal Testing: Where is the Discussion About Disability?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.