Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.

JAMA - 24 Jul 2013

Green Robert C, Lupski James R, Biesecker Leslie G

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Topics

Join the communities discussing this publication.

Disclosure
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Incidental Findings
Mutation
Personal Autonomy
Risk

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 23917280
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.41703
PMCID: PMC3963427

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.PMID 23917280Read ↗

Reporting Incidental Findings in Genomic Scale Clinical Sequencing—A Clinical Laboratory PerspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comprehensive genomic reporting structure for communicating all clinically significant primary and secondary findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

[Genomic sequencing in daily practice?].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rethinking clinical risk for DNA sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Your DNA is not your diagnosis: getting diagnoses right following secondary genomic findings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh inSemantic proximity Read ↗

How do consent forms for diagnostic high‐throughput sequencing address unsolicited and secondary findings? A content analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reporting practices for variants of uncertain significance from next generation sequencing technologies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Complexity of genome sequencing and reporting: Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and implementation of precision medicine in real lifeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

From Somatic Variants Toward Precision Oncology: An Investigation of Reporting Practice for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.