Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Reliability, completeness and accuracy of cleft subphenotyping as recorded on the CLEFTSiS (Cleft Service in Scotland) electronic patient record.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland - 1 Dec 2013

McBride W A, Mossey P A, McIntyre G T

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: The CLEFTSiS (Cleft Service in Scotland) electronic patient record (EPR) contains pre-surgical photographs among other records and this study proposes to assess the reliability of diagnosis and accuracy of the type and extent of cleft. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study, University of Dundee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all 1092 cases contained by the CLEFTSiS EPR from inception (April 2000)...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Electronic Health Records
Share to Infant, Newborn

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Phenotype

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to ROC Curve

Share to Scotland

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23786963
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.05.003

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Reliability, completeness and accuracy of cleft subphenotyping as recorded on the CLEFTSiS (Cleft Service in Scotland) electronic patient record.PMID 23786963Read ↗

Subphenotyping and Classification of Orofacial Clefts: Need for Orofacial Cleft Subphenotyping Calls for Revised Classification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Standardized Method for Description of Cleft Lip and Palate Phenotypes and Its Implementation in Daily PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cleft Lip – A Comprehensive ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Profiles of children born with Orofacial Clefts: Results from Fourteen East African CountriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic orofacial clefts and the influence of consanguinity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Issues involved in the phenotypic classification of orofacial clefts ascertained through a state birth defects registry for the north carolina cleft outcomes studySemantic proximity Read ↗

ICD-10 impact on ascertainment and accuracy of oral cleft cases as recorded by the Brazilian national live birth information system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cleft lip Sidedness and the Association with Additional Congenital Malformations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Smile Index: Part 1. A Large-Scale Study of Phenotypic Norms for Preoperative and Postoperative Unilateral Cleft Lip.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Subphenotyping and Classification of Cleft Lip and Alveolus in Adult Unoperated Patients: A New Embryological Approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cleft lip and palate: review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.