Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of above-ground and below-ground populations of Culex pipiens pipiens in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using 2 microsatellite assays.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association - 1 Dec 2012

Kothera Linda, Godsey Marvin, Mutebi John-Paul, Savage Harry M

Abstract excerpt

Aboveground and belowground populations of the mosquito Culex pipiens pipiens are traditionally classified as form (f.) pipiens and f. molestus, respectively, and gene flow between forms is thought to be limited. Relatively few f. molestus populations have been found in the United States, which has hindered their study in North America. In this investigation, we used microsatellites to characterize a recently...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Chicago
Share to Culex

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Genotype

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to New York City

Share to Phylogeny

Share to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 23401950
DOI: 10.2987/8756-971X-28.4.106
PMCID: PMC5501105

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of above-ground and below-ground populations of Culex pipiens pipiens in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using 2 microsatellite assays.PMID 23401950Read ↗

A comparison of aboveground and belowground populations of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic differences between Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in New York.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Studies on the origin of Culex pipiens pipiens form molestus in New York City.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic insights into the population structure of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Northeastern United States by using microsatellite analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in Colorado, USA using microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population genetic and admixture analyses of Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in California, United States.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High degree of single nucleotide polymorphisms in California Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) sensu lato.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic structure of the northern house mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) in a WNV-susceptible area.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic variation associated with mammalian feeding in Culex pipiens from a West Nile virus epidemic region in Chicago, Illinois.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Retrotransposon insertion sites vary within and between populations of Culex pipiens form molestus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diversity of Wolbachia pipientis strain wPip in a genetically admixtured, above-ground Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) population: association with form molestus ancestry and host selection patterns.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic variation among Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from the Sacramento Valley, California: horizontal and vertical transmission of West Nile virus, diapause potential, autogeny, and host selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.