Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Sept 2012

Pszczola M, Strabel T, van Arendonk J A M, Calus M P L

Abstract excerpt

Compared with traditional selection, the use of genomic information tends to increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBV). The cause of this increase is, however, unknown. To explore this phenomenon, this study investigated whether the increase in accuracy when moving from traditional (AA) to genomic selection (GG) was mainly due to genotyping the reference population (GA) or the evaluated animals...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22916948
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5550

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.PMID 22916948Read ↗

Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection in animal breeding programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic breeding values revisited: Assessment of two established approaches and a novel one to determine the accuracy in two-step genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of predictor traits on accuracy of genomic breeding values for feed intake based on a limited cow reference population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Improving accuracy of Jersey genomic evaluations in the United States and Denmark by sharing reference population bulls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection and its importance in animal breeding and genetic improvement revolution: A comprehensive reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.