Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Evaluation of dry and wet transport of at-home self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus testing.

Journal of medical microbiology - 1 Nov 2012

Wolfrum Sarah G, Koutsky Laura A, Hughes James P, Feng Qinghua, Xi Long Fu, Shen Zhenping, Winer Rachel L

Abstract excerpt

Our objective was to compare human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in paired self-collected vaginal samples transported by overnight mail in liquid specimen transport medium (STM) (wet) or in dry tubes (dry). Women aged 18-24 years were recruited online to self-collect vaginal swab samples at home...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Actins
Share to Alphapapillomavirus
Share to DNA, Viral

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene Expression Regulation, Viral

Share to Specimen Handling

Share to Time Factors

Share to Vagina

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22899778
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.046110-0

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-22899778-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Evaluation of dry and wet transport of at-home self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus testing.PMID 22899778Read ↗

Randomized Comparison of Two Vaginal Self-Sampling Methods for Human Papillomavirus Detection: Dry Swab versus FTA Cartridge.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Concordance of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Mailed Home-Based Self-Collected Versus Clinician-Collected Anal Swabs Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Detection and Cytology Using a New Self-Sampling Method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Agreement for HPV genotyping detection between self-collected specimens on a FTA cartridge and clinician-collected specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of two self‐sampling methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing among women with high prevalence ratesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in vaginal self-samples: evaluation of eNat® as an alternative suspension medium to ThinPrep®PreservCyt® for vaginal swabsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Urine sample for HPV detection in men: is it a valid and non-invasive diagnostic alternative?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Concordance and Acceptability of Self- Vs. Clinician-Collected Anorectal Swabs for HPV Genotyping in Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in Metropolitan Barcelona.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Good concordance of HPV detection between cervico-vaginal self-samples and general practitioner-collected samples using the Cobas 4800 HPV DNA testSemantic proximity Read ↗

Validity and Acceptance of Self vs Conventional Sampling for the Analysis of Human Papillomavirus and Pap SmearSemantic proximity Read ↗

New strategies for human papillomavirus-based cervical screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Viability of Self-Taken Vaginal Swab Samples for RNA-Based Biomarker Analysis in Cervical DiseaseSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.