Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Associations of genetic markers in cattle receiving differing implant protocols.

Journal of animal science - 1 Jul 2012

King D A, Shackelford S D, McDaneld T G, Kuehn L A, Kemp C M, Smith T P L, Wheeler T L, Koohmaraie M

Abstract excerpt

The potential interaction of growth-promoting implants and genetic markers previously reported to be associated with growth, carcass traits, and tenderness was evaluated. Two implant protocols were applied to subsets of steers (n = 383) and heifers (n = 65) that were also genotyped for 47 SNP reported to be associated with variation in growth, fat thickness, LM area, marbling, or tenderness. The "mild" protocol...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Weight Gain
Share to Cattle
Share to Dose-Response Relationship, Drug

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Estradiol

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22767554
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4693

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 10 closest

Associations of genetic markers in cattle receiving differing implant protocols.PMID 22767554Read ↗

Effects of genetic markers and implant strategy on longissimus and gluteus muscle tenderness of calf-fed steers and heifers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of DNA polymorphisms involving growth hormone relative to growth and carcass characteristics in Brahman steers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relationships between fed cattle traits and Igenity panel scores.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic analysis of carcass traits of steers adjusted to age, weight, or fat thickness slaughter endpoints.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of supplementing zilpaterol hydrochloride on feeding performance and carcass characteristics of steers sorted by leptin genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decreased growth in angus steers with a short TG-microsatellite allele in the P1 promoter of the growth hormone receptor gene.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environmental interaction for mature size and rate of maturing for Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal-cross cows grazing bermudagrass or endophyte infected fescue.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of pro-melanin concentrating hormone genotype with beef carcass quality and yield.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relationship among GeneSTAR marbling marker, intramuscular fat deposition, and expected progeny differences in early weaned Simmental steers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of Piedmontese inheritance and myostatin genotype on the palatability of longissimus thoracis, gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.