Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography.

doi:10.1073/pnas.1203005109

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Community

Back to search

Article

Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America - 5 Jun 2012

Larson Greger, Karlsson Elinor K, Perri Angela, Webster Matthew T, Ho Simon Y W, Peters Joris, Stahl Peter W, Piper Philip J, Lingaas Frode, Fredholm Merete, Comstock Kenine E, Modiano Jaime F, Schelling Claude, Agoulnik Alexander I, Leegwater Peter A, Dobney Keith, Vigne Jean-Denis, Vilà Carles, Andersson Leif, Lindblad-Toh Kerstin

Abstract excerpt

The dog was the first domesticated animal but it remains uncertain when the domestication process began and whether it occurred just once or multiple times across the Northern Hemisphere. To ascertain the value of modern genetic data to elucidate the origins of dog domestication, we analyzed 49,024 autosomal SNPs in 1,375 dogs (representing 35 breeds) and 19 wolves. After combining our data with previously...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Animals, Domestic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Archaeology

Share to Cluster Analysis

Share to Demography

Share to Dogs

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Phylogeography

Share to Species Specificity

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22615366
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203005109
PMCID: PMC3384140

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography.PMID 22615366Read ↗

Genomic Analyses Reveal the Influence of Geographic Origin, Migration, and Hybridization on Modern Dog Breed Development.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Grey wolf genomic history reveals a dual ancestry of dogs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Worldwide patterns of genomic variation and admixture in gray wolves.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Toward understanding dog evolutionary and domestication history.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the origin of mongrels: evolutionary history of free-breeding dogs in Eurasia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic analyses of modern dog breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Canine genomics and genetics: running with the pack.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Origin, genetic diversity, and genome structure of the domestic dog.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the pivotal role of the neural crest in dog domesticationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.