Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Empirical evaluation of DArT, SNP, and SSR marker-systems for genotyping, clustering, and assigning sugar beet hybrid varieties into populations.

Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology - 1 Mar 2012

Simko Ivan, Eujayl Imad, van Hintum Theo J L

Abstract excerpt

Dominant and co-dominant molecular markers are routinely used in plant genetic research. In the present study we assessed the success-rate of three marker-systems for estimating genotypic diversity, clustering varieties into populations, and assigning a single variety into the expected population. A set of 54 diploid sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) hybrid varieties from five seed companies was...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Area Under Curve
Share to Beta vulgaris

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cluster Analysis

Share to Genetic Loci

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to Hybridization, Genetic

Share to Population Dynamics

Share to Statistics as Topic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22284710
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.12.009

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Empirical evaluation of DArT, SNP, and SSR marker-systems for genotyping, clustering, and assigning sugar beet hybrid varieties into populations.PMID 22284710Read ↗

Characterisation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) varieties using microsatellite markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Applicability of SCoT markers in unraveling genetic variation and population structure among sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) germplasm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Discriminant analysis of principal components and pedigree assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in a tetraploid potato panel using SNPs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High throughput analysis of grape genetic diversity as a tool for germplasm collection management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SNP marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).Semantic proximity Read ↗

High-throughput genotyping of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) utilising diversity arrays technology (DArT).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity is enhanced in Wild × Cultivated hybrids of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) despite multiple selection cycles for cultivated traitsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis in elite sugar beet breeding lines and wild beet accessions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying genetic diversity: the starting point for population genetic studies using molecular markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium in a worldwide collection of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) germplasm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide distribution of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in elite sugar beet germplasm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diversity array technology markers: genetic diversity analyses and linkage map construction in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.