Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of strategies for selecting breeding pairs to maximize genetic diversity retention in managed populations.

The Journal of heredity - 1 Jan 2000

Ivy Jamie A, Lacy Robert C

Abstract excerpt

Captive breeding programs aim to maintain populations that are demographically self-sustaining and genetically healthy. It has been well documented that the best way for managed breeding programs to retain gene diversity (GD) and limit inbreeding is to select breeding pairs that minimize a popula...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Conservation of Natural Resources

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Inbreeding

Share to Models, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22246407
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr129

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-22246407-2026-09-04.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of strategies for selecting breeding pairs to maximize genetic diversity retention in managed populations.PMID 22246407Read ↗

Kinship-based management strategies for captive breeding programs when pedigrees are unknown or uncertain.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysing the pedigree to identify undesirable losses of genetic diversity and to prioritize management decisions in captive breeding: a case study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies to improve on selection based on estimated breeding values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Linkage- and ROH-based genomic relationship matrices for IBD based management of genetic diversity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection strategies and their potential to maintain rare alleles and de-novo mutations: a long-term assessment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Moving Beyond Managing Realized Genomic Relationship in Long-Term Genomic Selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic approaches to mitigating genetic diversity loss in declining populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.