Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Bayesian clustering and edge detection methods for inferring boundaries in landscape genetics.

International journal of molecular sciences - 25 Jan 2011

Safner Toni, Miller Mark P, McRae Brad H, Fortin Marie-Josée, Manel Stéphanie

Abstract excerpt

Recently, techniques available for identifying clusters of individuals or boundaries between clusters using genetic data from natural populations have expanded rapidly. Consequently, there is a need to evaluate these different techniques. We used spatially-explicit simulation models to compare three spatial Bayesian clustering programs and two edge detection methods. Spatially-structured populations were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Ecosystem
Share to Evolution, Molecular

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Population

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 21541031
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12020865
PMCID: PMC3083678

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Bayesian clustering and edge detection methods for inferring boundaries in landscape genetics.PMID 21541031Read ↗

A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance?Semantic proximity Read ↗

A new individual-based spatial approach for identifying genetic discontinuities in natural populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Data Describe Population Structure but Struggle to Estimate Directed Connectivity Networks.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nonstationary patterns of isolation-by-distance: inferring measures of local genetic differentiation with Bayesian kriging.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing phylogeographic hypotheses by simulating DNA sequences under a spatially explicit model of coalescence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Habitat barriers limit gene flow and illuminate historical events in a wide-ranging carnivore, the American puma.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Isolation by distance, resistance and/or clusters? Lessons learned from a forest-dwelling carnivore inhabiting a heterogeneous landscape.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence for cryptic genetic discontinuity in a recently expanded sika deer population on the Boso Peninsula, central Japan.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatial genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and migration patterns in a continuously harvested grey wolf (Canis lupus) population in north-eastern Europe.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Network-based genetic monitoring of landscape fragmentation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Visualizing spatial population structure with estimated effective migration surfacesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.