Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Craniometric similarities within and between human populations in comparison with neutral genetic data.

Human biology - 1 Jun 2010

Strauss André, Hubbe Mark

Abstract excerpt

The statement that pairs of individuals from different populations are often more genetically similar than pairs from the same population is a widespread idea inside and outside the scientific community. Witherspoon et al. ["Genetic similarities within and between human populations," Genetics 176:351-359 (2007)] proposed an index called the dissimilarity fraction (omega) to access in a quantitative way the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Africa
Share to Asia
Share to Cephalometry

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Confidence Intervals

Share to Databases, Factual

Share to Europe

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Reference Values

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20649387
DOI: 10.3378/027.082.0305

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Craniometric similarities within and between human populations in comparison with neutral genetic data.PMID 20649387Read ↗

Craniometric variation among modern human populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic validation of the differential preservation of population history in modern human cranial anatomy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The craniofacial shape of modern humans embodies genomic signatures of evolution, diversity, and clinical conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Testing the utility of dental morphological trait combinations for inferring human neutral genetic variation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multivariate apportionment of global human craniometric diversity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Misestimation of Expected Genetic Differences: A Statistical Note on Some Recent PapersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Global patterns of isolation by distance based on genetic and morphological data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Population-Genetic Perspective on the Similarities and Differences among Worldwide Human Populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Heritability of human cranial dimensions: comparing the evolvability of different cranial regions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.