Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Influence of spatial structure on the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Journal of theoretical biology - 7 Oct 2008

Ament Irene, Scheu Stefan, Drossel Barbara

Abstract excerpt

We include spatial extension into a model for the maintenance of sexual reproduction introduced recently. The model is based on a broad spectrum of resources, which regrow slowly. Other key features of the model are that sexual reproduction sets in when resources become scarce and that only a few genotypes can coexist locally. The extension of the model to several patches in space is done in two different ways....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biological Evolution
Share to Competitive Behavior
Share to Computer Simulation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Ecosystem

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Parthenogenesis

Share to Population Dynamics

Share to Reproduction

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18640129
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.06.024

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Influence of spatial structure on the maintenance of sexual reproduction.PMID 18640129Read ↗

Geographic parthenogenesis in a consumer-resource model for sexual reproduction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The geography of sex: sexual conflict, environmental gradients and local loss of sex in facultatively parthenogenetic animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Range expansions of sexual versus asexual organisms: Effects of reproductive assurance and migration load.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Migration load and the coexistence of ecologically similar sexuals and asexuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spatial Structure Can Decrease Symbiotic CooperationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Does evolution of iteroparous and semelparous reproduction call for spatially structured systems?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic structure of natural Nasonia vitripennis populations: validating assumptions of sex-ratio theory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sex-biased dispersal creates spatial genetic structure in a parthenogenetic ant with a dependent-lineage reproductive system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Vector dynamics influence spatially imperfect genetic interventions against diseaseSemantic proximity Read ↗

Consequences of clonality for sexual fitness: Clonal expansion enhances fitness under spatially restricted dispersal.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Geographic ranges, population structure, and ages of sexual and parthenogenetic snail lineages.Semantic proximity Read ↗

When GIS zooms in: spatio-genetic maps of multipaternity in Armadillidium vulgare.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.